The four powers behind the al-Qaeda conspiracy
From the Times newspaper. a fascinating read Here on the manufactured 'fear' that comes along with the use of that word 'Al-qaeda' .
For the few of you that dont know 'Al-qaeda' means 'The Base' and applied to terrorist training camps in Afghanistan that were in use by Osama Bin Ladens group , those camps were bombed and 'the base' no longer exists .
The terrorist groups being formed each day now , have NO link to Osama , No link to 'The base'
To call these groups Al-qaeda is like calling a fat Japanese gentleman in a Karaoke bar the real Elvis just because he happens to be singing jail house rock
They are copies , the horrific attacks in London and the tragic bombing's in Egypt are not the work of some world wide group .. they are separate events carried out by seperate groups with no link in between , there is no evidence to suggest that Osama Bin laden and his group (if even alive) had any idea these attacks would happen.
to create a climate of fear by using the A word everytime something goes bang adds a certain justification to actions that can not exist if these events are taken in isolation
anyway if you still don't know the four powers behind the Al-qaeda Conspiracy then you have spent to long reading me instead of the article.
For the few of you that dont know 'Al-qaeda' means 'The Base' and applied to terrorist training camps in Afghanistan that were in use by Osama Bin Ladens group , those camps were bombed and 'the base' no longer exists .
The terrorist groups being formed each day now , have NO link to Osama , No link to 'The base'
To call these groups Al-qaeda is like calling a fat Japanese gentleman in a Karaoke bar the real Elvis just because he happens to be singing jail house rock
They are copies , the horrific attacks in London and the tragic bombing's in Egypt are not the work of some world wide group .. they are separate events carried out by seperate groups with no link in between , there is no evidence to suggest that Osama Bin laden and his group (if even alive) had any idea these attacks would happen.
to create a climate of fear by using the A word everytime something goes bang adds a certain justification to actions that can not exist if these events are taken in isolation
anyway if you still don't know the four powers behind the Al-qaeda Conspiracy then you have spent to long reading me instead of the article.
posted by _H_ at 4:53 am
6 Comments:
Yeah, but that makes it easier to say, instead of saying "another one of those crazy ass Islamists groups that closely parallel the idealogy of Osama Bin Laden". You see, just say Al Queda, it's easier.
So what's your point anyway? Is Al Queda all made up, fantasy land, type stuff? Or you just don't like how the media clumps them all together and gives them one name?
the media and the government yes . of course the attacks are happening , but osama bin laden didnt know .. he didnt fund it
as i say these are copy cats
my point is the same as the point being made by the highly respected Times newspaer of London
so your point is you don't like it that the media calls these groups Al Queda.
What do you want them to be called?
criminals .murderers . terrorists if you must
but linking them all to a single orginised controlled network smells a little like george orwell to me
i am not muslim (or any religion)
but when the IRA attacked we didnt call all catholics terrorists
or maybe you did ?
I might be way way wrong here, and I'm sure you will straighten me out if that is the case, but I notice that you didn't bother answering this last one.
Might that be because the answer to the question doesn't quite fit with your overall thinking? In other words, it doesn't really matter to you that the media and the governments keep referring to these groups as Al Queda. What matters to you is the need to refute the danger all together. The danger is exaggerated, made up by politicians to cement their power. Or something like that.
I don't want to speak for you, so I guess I'll quit, but it is noticable how quick you will jump at the opportunity to quote nonsense such as "there was no terrorism in Iraq prior to 2003", but you will allow a simple question like this one to slide, even though sometimes the simple questions get right at the heart of the matter.
do you call a fat elvis look alike at a karooke bar the real Elvis ??
please dont assume i dont answer you when you are posting at random posts all over my site it takes me a while to get around to them thats all ... i will answer any post you make .. this question was answered in the original article
on this point . it seems my little right winged fury friend that you havent actually answered any questions yourself
how ironic
you have mocked the "no terrorists in iraq before the war" thing 3 times now but
hark ?
i hear no examples from you ?
if i am wrong you dont need to spout the dribble you do . just say
something like
March 2000 alqaeda bombed baghdad ! (as an example) that would shut me up wouldnt it ?
but it appears you have NO facts to justify what you say
if you choose to go now . then oh well it was fun .
come back anytime :O)
Post a Comment
<< Home